…And What About Jo Anne Simon? Atlantic Yards & Beyond

Excuse me, which way is Atlantic Yards?

Excuse me, which way is Atlantic Yards?

While Steve Levin has certainly been deserving of our ire (and there is more to come), it would be unfair to forgo questions with some of the other candidates running for the 33rd.  We have decided to start with Jo Anne Simon because her record (or really the lack of one) is most deserving of scrutiny.  Simon claims the be a reformer who has worked on every important issue in the 33rd for the past several years.  But this begs the question: What has she done exactly?  The answer: Not much.

The best place to start is with her two websites: the one she maintains for her legal practice listing community service and the one for her campaign.  Her legal practice website touts expertise in land use issues (which she also stumps at events like the St. Francis College debate this evening).  Specifically, her site lists her work as Chair of the Boerum Hill Association’s Land Use Committee (1992-2005); Chair of its Atlantic Yards Task Force (2003-2006); and being a member its Hoyt-Schermerhorn Task Force.  She also says that she was a Co-founder of the Downtown Brooklyn Neighborhood Coalition, “created to bring forward the voice of the communities surrounding downtown Brooklyn regarding transportation and land use concerns.”

So what does that all mean, exactly?  Well, it appears to mean that she has gone to a lot of meetings, submitted written testimony at public hearings, and nothing really beyond that.  For instance, and perhaps the best example, on Atlantic Yards, Simon claimed strenuously this evening to have been an “early vocal opponent of the use of eminent domain.”  But her “Testimony to the Empire State Development Corporation on the General Project Plan, Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Proposed Condemnation of Real Property and terms for the proposed acquisition and conveyance of the Atlantic Yards Project Site”, dated August 23, 2006, never even mentions, let alone objects, to the use of eminent domain or condemnation.  Her August 25, 2006 letter to the head of the Empire State Development Corporation about the project also make no mention whatsoever about the use of eminent domain.  How vocal is that?  It’s not.  In reality, Simon is most identified with BrooklynSpeaks and its “mend-it-don’t-end-it” stance on Atlantic Yards.

Simon’s track record is even more troubling, however, because of who she is — a purportedly talented civil rights lawyer.  The simple fact is that she has never lifted a legal finger to help litigate the numerous Atlantic Yard eminent domain cases.  By way of sterling example, Develop Don’t Destroy has an active volunteer legal team that has worked pro bono for years against that project.  Simon’s contribution to the effort: nothing.  Then, there are other land use legal fights that have taken place in the 33rd District where Simon has been a no show with offers to help as a community lawyer: Brooklyn Bridge Park, Dock Street, Brooklyn House of Detention, Greenpoint-Williamsburg Rezoning.  We just wonder:  If Jo Anne Simon has never used her legal talents to defend her community, how do we know that she is going to be able to effectively fight for us in the City Council?


9 responses to “…And What About Jo Anne Simon? Atlantic Yards & Beyond

  1. So who exactly are you backing? I notice a suspicious lack of names in any identification of this site ownership. “We” are a bunch of “concerned citizens” in the 33rd District. Not that what you say isn’t interesting, but if you’re faceless, you’re worse than any candidate you’re going after.
    Anonymous sniping sounds like you’re from the campaign office of somebody else. We know it’s not Levin, or Simon; doesn’t sound like the Isaac Abraham crowd; which leaves 4 others. I’m betting this is more empty Diamondstone stuff. I sure hope Evan Theis isn’t resorting to this stuff!
    Sign something and maybe you’ll have some credibility. Right now you’ve got zip.

    • realreformbrooklyn


      We see you commented again. We appreciate that you find what he have to say interesting.

      As we said in reply to your other comment regarding our anonymity, we are a group of people who live, work and volunteer in organizations throughout the District. We are not candidates for political office. We are committed to providing truthful, accurate and thoughtful posts. Please understand our decision to remain anonymous is because we do not want to punished for being honest. Also, we are not working for any campaign. We hope that addresses your concern with our credibility.

      Real Reform Brooklyn

    • uh, Simon, you are anonymous too, and faceless. Me too!. there is reason for it.

  2. Sorry, not buying it. I saw on another blog where one of Isaac Abraham’s supporters commented on something and signed off with this website’s address as their address. So your response sounds totally bogus and I am concluding this is just some shooting gallery on Abraham’s behalf. Prove me wrong and do your velvet hatchet job on Mr. Abraham. Not holding my breath for that. Less credibility than yesterday.

    BTW, claiming you need anonymity to avoid being “punished for being honest” makes you sound pretty spineless. But seeing as this is a stealth political promo site, not inaccurate.

    • realreformbrooklyn


      We do not think that Isaac Abraham stands a chance in the race. Given our limited amount of time and resources, we probably won’t even bother doing a piece on him. That may change, but we doubt it. That view may not be the “velvet hatchet job” you’re looking for but it will have to do.

      As for being spineless over concerns about being punished for our honesty, you are entitled to your opinion. We think that Vito Lopez can be pretty vindictive. So, no thanks. We are not rising to the bait.

      Real Reform Brooklyn

  3. “We think that Vito Lopez can be pretty vindictive.”

    You are on the money with that statement. I describe Lopez with just one word: SCUMBAG!

  4. Pingback: Steve Levin: How I Learned to Stop Worrying & Hate Atlantic Yards « Real Reform Brooklyn Blog

  5. Pingback: Jo Anne Simon & Atlantic Yards: The Revisionist History « Real Reform Brooklyn Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s